Urban Green Cover & Heat Risk Assessment: Adelaide-region

Yaragarla, Ramkumar

Observation Metadata

Satellite Platform	Sentinel-2B (Sentinel 2)
Observation Date	2025-11-26
Cloud Cover	25.442588%
Spectral Bands Used	B04 (Red), B08 (NIR), B11 (SWIR1), B12 (SWIR2)
Processing Date	2025-12-07

Sentinel-2 satellite preview of Adelaide-region, captured on 2025-11-26 from an altitude of approximately 786 km.

Statement of Problem

Rapid urbanization and climate change are placing unprecedented stress on cities worldwide. As built-up areas expand and green spaces decline, urban heat islands intensify, air quality deteriorates, and residents face increased health risks. Understanding the spatial distribution of vegetation and development is essential for evidence-based urban planning, climate adaptation, and public health protection. This analysis quantifies the current balance between green cover and built-up surfaces in Adelaide-region, identifies thermal vulnerability hotspots, and provides actionable recommendations for enhancing urban forestry and green infrastructure.

1. Urban Forestry Assessment: Current Vegetation & Built-Up Status

1.1 Vegetation Distribution (NDVI Analysis)

The NDVI statistics for the Adelaide region reveal a mean NDVI value of 0.213, indicating moderate green cover. The median NDVI is slightly lower at 0.197, suggesting a skew towards lower vegetation density in certain areas. The standard deviation of 0.146 highlights significant variability in vegetation density across the region. Spatially, the NDVI color map shows patches of higher vegetation density, particularly in suburban and peri-urban areas, while central urban areas display lower NDVI values. The NDVI greyscale map corroborates these patterns, providing a clearer visual representation of vegetation distribution. These findings underscore the need for targeted urban forestry initiatives to enhance green cover in under-vegetated zones.

1.2 Built-Up Intensity (NDBI Analysis)

The NDBI statistics for the Adelaide region show a mean NDBI value of -0.025, indicating a relatively low level of built-up intensity overall. However, the standard deviation of 0.126 suggests significant variability, with some areas experiencing higher levels of urbanization. The NDBI maps reveal that the central urban core exhibits the highest built-up intensity, with NDBI values approaching 0.38. Suburban areas show moderate built-up intensity, while rural and peri-urban zones display lower NDBI values. These patterns highlight the ongoing development pressures in central Adelaide and the need for sustainable urban planning to manage growth effectively.

NDVI Color Visualization

NDVI Greyscale (Index Values)

NDBI Color Visualization

NDBI Greyscale (Index Values)

Additional Vegetation & Water Indices

Beyond NDVI and NDBI, three complementary indices provide deeper insights into vegetation health and water presence:

EVI (Enhanced Vegetation Index)

EVI improves on NDVI by correcting for atmospheric conditions and canopy background noise. It is more sensitive in areas with dense vegetation, making it useful for monitoring forest health and identifying vegetation stress that NDVI might miss.

EVI Color Visualization

EVI Greyscale (Index Values)

MNDWI (Modified Normalized Difference Water Index)

MNDWI enhances water body detection by using green and shortwave infrared bands. It is more effective than NDWI at separating water features from built-up areas, making it ideal for mapping urban water bodies like lakes, rivers, and reservoirs.

MNDWI Color Visualization

MNDWI Greyscale (Index Values)

NDMI (Normalized Difference Moisture Index)

NDMI measures vegetation water content by comparing near-infrared and shortwave infrared reflectance. Higher values indicate well-hydrated vegetation, while lower values suggest drought stress. This index is valuable for assessing irrigation effectiveness and identifying areas at risk of vegetation die-off.

NDMI Color Visualization

NDMI Greyscale (Index Values)

2. Vegetation-Development Balance Analysis

2.1 NDVI-NDBI Difference Analysis

The NDVI-NDBI difference analysis provides valuable insights into the balance between vegetation and built-up areas in the Adelaide region. The difference bins reveal that approximately 39.12% of the region falls into the 0.016 to 0.409 range, indicating a moderate balance between vegetation and built-up areas. However, a significant 38.47% of the region shows a strong dominance of vegetation over built-up areas (NDVI-NDBI > 1.19). Conversely, 10.28% of the region exhibits a strong dominance of built-up areas over vegetation (NDVI-NDBI < 0.016). The difference map and legend illustrate these patterns spatially, with green zones representing vegetation dominance and red zones indicating built-up dominance. These findings highlight the need for targeted urban planning to maintain a healthy balance between green spaces and built environments.

2.2 Overlay Interpretation

The combined overlay image of NDVI and NDBI reveals distinct patterns when viewed together. Areas with high NDVI values (green cover) and low NDBI values (low built-up intensity) appear in shades of green, indicating successful integration of green spaces within the urban fabric. Conversely, areas with low NDVI and high NDBI values appear in shades of red, highlighting zones of intense urbanization with limited green cover. This overlay provides a comprehensive view of the vegetation-built-up balance across the Adelaide region, informing targeted urban planning and green infrastructure initiatives.

NDVI-NDBI Difference Map (Green = vegetation-dominated; Red = built-up-dominated)

Combined NDVI-NDBI Overlay

3. Urban Heat Island Risk & Thermal Vulnerability

3.1 Heat Risk Distribution

The heat risk distribution analysis, based on the urban heat index bins, identifies critical zones of varying heat risk across the Adelaide region. Approximately 48.54% of the region falls into the lowest heat risk category (-0.016 to 0.38), indicating areas where vegetation likely mitigates urban heat. However, a concerning 10.11% of the region is classified as high heat risk (-0.801 to -0.409), suggesting zones where built-up intensity outweighs vegetation cover, exacerbating the urban heat island effect. The heat index map and legend visually represent these patterns, with cooler tones indicating lower heat risk and warmer tones signifying higher risk. These findings underscore the urgent need for targeted cooling strategies in high-risk zones to protect public health and enhance urban livability.

3.2 Key Findings & Implications

Total green cover percentage: 26.01%
Healthy vegetation percentage: 4.52%
Vegetation health score: 0.409
Green infrastructure score: 0.495

Urban Heat Index Map (Red = high risk zones)

4. Strategic Recommendations for Green Infrastructure

4.1 What's Working Well

The presence of green corridors and parks in suburban areas, as evidenced by higher NDVI values, contributes to overall urban green cover and provides valuable ecosystem services.
Certain peri-urban zones exhibit a healthy balance between vegetation and built-up areas, as shown in the NDVI-NDBI difference map, indicating successful integration of green spaces within the urban landscape.

4.2 Critical Challenges

Central urban areas show a significant dominance of built-up intensity over vegetation, as indicated by high NDBI values and low NDVI values, leading to increased heat risk and reduced ecosystem services.
A substantial portion of the region (10.28%) exhibits a strong dominance of built-up areas over vegetation, highlighting the need for targeted urban greening initiatives to mitigate heat risk and enhance livability.

4.3 Evidence-Based Recommendations

Implement targeted greening initiatives in central urban areas, focusing on increasing tree canopy cover and creating green corridors to mitigate heat risk and enhance ecosystem services.
Encourage the integration of green infrastructure in new development projects, ensuring a balanced approach between built-up areas and vegetation to maintain ecological balance.
Develop and enforce urban planning policies that prioritize the preservation and expansion of existing green spaces, particularly in high-risk heat zones, to protect public health and enhance urban livability.

Analysis Coverage Area

The interactive map below shows the exact geographical bounds of this satellite analysis. The colored overlay represents the NDVI coverage area overlaid on OpenStreetMap. You can zoom and pan to explore how the analysis boundaries align with streets, neighborhoods, and landmarks in Adelaide-region.

Interactive map: Use mouse/touch to zoom and pan. The overlay shows the satellite image bounds used for NDVI/NDBI calculations.

Note: The analysis boundaries may extend beyond administrative city limits as they represent the satellite image crop captured on 2025-11-26. This ensures complete coverage of the urban area and surrounding regions for comprehensive vegetation and heat risk assessment.

Why Urban Green Cover Matters

Urban forests and green spaces are critical infrastructure for healthy, livable cities. Trees and vegetation reduce air pollution, lower urban temperatures through shade and evapotranspiration, manage stormwater, support biodiversity, and improve mental health and well-being. As cities grow denser and climate change intensifies heat events, monitoring and protecting urban green cover becomes essential for public health and environmental resilience.

Satellite remote sensing provides objective, repeatable measurements of vegetation health and urban development patterns across entire metropolitan areas. The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) quantifies photosynthetic activity and green cover, while the Normalized Difference Built-up Index (NDBI) identifies impervious surfaces and development intensity. Together, these indices reveal the changing balance between nature and urban growth—and highlight where intervention is most needed.

Understanding NDVI and NDBI

NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) measures the difference between near-infrared light (strongly reflected by healthy vegetation) and red light (absorbed by chlorophyll). Values range from -1 to +1, with higher values indicating denser, healthier vegetation. Typical ranges: 0.6-0.9 = dense forest; 0.3-0.6 = moderate vegetation; 0.1-0.3 = sparse vegetation; <0.1 = bare soil or built-up areas.

NDBI (Normalized Difference Built-up Index) uses shortwave infrared and near-infrared bands to identify constructed surfaces. Positive values indicate built-up areas (roads, buildings, concrete), while negative values suggest natural or vegetated land. When NDBI exceeds NDVI in an area, it signals high development intensity and elevated urban heat island risk.

README Note

Our Mission: We want this research dataset brief to be Simple, Authentic, and Repeatable.

1. Title of the Dataset

Urban Green Cover and Heat Risk Assessment

2. What This Dataset Is About

This dataset was created to help anyone understand how vegetation and green cover in this region is changing over time. It brings together processed satellite data, simple calculations, and a few observations that give the bigger picture.

3. Why This Dataset Matters

At I Hug Trees, we believe that Geospatial Satellite imagery and processed data should be accessible to everyone. While grounded in scientific principles, outputs are presented in accessible formats so that technical imagery and calculations resonate with ordinary people and communities. Because only when it is relatable, can it tell clear stories about our greenery and urban life: shaping how we live, how we breathe, and how we cope with rising heat.

This dataset tries to make that easier. Whether you are a researcher, policy maker, student or just curious about the environment, these numbers and images help you see trends that are not obvious at first glance.

4. Source of the Data

Satellite: Sentinel-2
Provider: Microsoft Planetary Computer
Acquisition Window: Past 60 days (filtered by cloud cover)
Cloud Cover Threshold: < 30%
Initial Tile Discovery: Copernicus Data Space Ecosystem browser

5. How the Data Was Processed

Basic Preprocessing:

It is important to get the right tile from the Sentinel-2 database for imagery processing. The browser feature from the Copernicus Data Space Ecosystem helped us identify the correct tile, its bounds, and the subset coordinates needed for extraction. It is always essential to double-check the preview image to verify that the fetched tile truly corresponds to the target region.

Next, we used an AWS Lambda environment for the bounds-discovery phase. This step involved fetching band data from the Microsoft Planetary Computer for dates where cloud cover was below 30% within the past 60 days. Once the acquisition date met this condition, we moved to AWS EC2 server scripts written in Python to download raw band data and process them into COGs (Cloud Optimised GeoTIFFs) along with additional indices.

These processed COGs and index outputs are then used for image displays, NDVI interpretation, and HTML digest features published on our platform. All indices raw value outputs are in JSON files for easy repeatable processing. We currently run this workflow on a quarterly schedule for each identified region.

Cloud Masking:

This dataset uses Sentinel-2's Scene Classification Layer (SCL) to remove pixels affected by clouds, shadows, haze, and saturation. Only surface-clear classes are kept, ensuring that the vegetation indices are calculated from clean, reliable pixels. The masking is applied at the pixel level, meaning every index (NDVI, EVI, etc.) is computed only on valid areas after stripping away noisy regions. This results in more trustworthy COGs, cleaner previews, and more meaningful temporal comparisons.

Calculation Formulas Used:

NDVI = (NIR − Red) ÷ (NIR + Red)
EVI = 2.5 × (NIR − Red) ÷ (NIR + 6×Red − 7.5×Blue + 1)
NDWI = (Green − NIR) ÷ (Green + NIR)
NDBI = (SWIR1 − NIR) ÷ (SWIR1 + NIR)

Tools Used:

Data Source: Microsoft Planetary Computer (Sentinel-2 L2A), rasterio, GDAL
Computation: Python 3, NumPy, SciPy, Pillow, Rasterio, rio-cogeo
AWS Pipeline: Lambda (triggers), EC2 (processing), S3 (storage), Bedrock (AI summaries)
Mapping: Leaflet.js, tile layers served from S3
Automation: Python boto3, Cron (EC2 quarterly jobs)

6. File Contents

The dataset includes metadata.json with satellite tile information, various index outputs (NDVI, EVI, NDWI, NDBI, MNDWI, NDMI), and statistical summaries. Please find the detailed list of files available for download in the Download Data & Maps section below.

7. How to Use This Dataset

You can explore the NDVI trends, plug the json file into your favourite tool, build visualisations, or compare it with earlier datasets. It's created to be flexible.

8. Leveraging AI

AI helped speed up some parts of the work, like spotting unusual patterns, creating brief insights, and checking for inconsistencies. All metadata and bin-statistics JSON files were loaded and parsed into structured dictionaries, ensuring the AI receives clean, context-rich inputs for stable summarisation and interpretation.

9. Limitations & Things to Keep in Mind

Cloud cover may affect accuracy
NDVI has known limitations
Spatial resolution is 10 meters
Some patterns may need ground truth validation

10. License / Permissions

Please refer to the How to Cite This Analysis section below for citation guidelines. This dataset is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).

11. Contact

For any questions, collaborations, or clarifications, feel free to reach out at: nature@ihugtrees.org

Data & Methods

Data Sources

Satellite: Sentinel-2B Level-2A (atmospherically corrected)
Provider: Microsoft Planetary Computer
Observation Date: 2025-11-26
Cloud Cover: 25.442588%
Spatial Resolution: 10 meters (NDVI), 20 meters (NDBI, resampled to 10m)

Index Calculations

NDVI = (NIR - Red) / (NIR + Red) using Bands 8 and 4
NDBI = (SWIR1 - NIR) / (SWIR1 + NIR) using Bands 11 and 8
Difference Index = NDVI - NDBI (positive = vegetation-dominated; negative = built-up-dominated)
Urban Heat Index = Composite metric flagging areas where NDBI > NDVI (high heat risk)

Processing Workflow

Images were processed using Python with the pystac-client and rasterio libraries. Cloud masking was applied using the QA60 scene classification layer. Statistics were computed using rasterio zonal statistics and exported as JSON for analysis. All geospatial outputs are provided as Cloud-Optimized GeoTIFFs (COGs) for efficient web access and GIS integration.

Limitations

Analysis represents a single-day snapshot; seasonal and temporal trends require time-series analysis
Cloud cover and atmospheric conditions affect image quality
10-meter resolution may not capture individual trees or small green spaces
Study area boundaries reflect the satellite image crop, not administrative city limits
Heat risk is inferred from spectral indices; ground validation recommended for mitigation planning

Download Data & Maps

Images & Visualizations

Geospatial Data (Cloud-Optimized GeoTIFFs)

Statistical Data

How to Cite This Analysis

Recommended Citation

Yaragarla, R. (2025). Urban Green Cover & Heat Risk Assessment: Adelaide-region. I Hug Trees. Retrieved from https://ihugtrees.org/data-analytics/sentinel-ndvi/Adelaide-region/2025/12/04/digest.html

Satellite data: Copernicus Sentinel-2 (ESA), processed via Microsoft Planetary Computer.

BibTeX Entry

@misc{ihugtrees_urban_adelaide-region_2025,
  author = {Yaragarla, Ramkumar},
  title = {Urban Green Cover \& Heat Risk Assessment: Adelaide-region},
  year = {2025},
  publisher = {I Hug Trees},
  url = {https://ihugtrees.org/data-analytics/sentinel-ndvi/Adelaide-region/2025/12/04/digest.html},
  note = {Satellite data: Copernicus Sentinel-2}
}

License

This analysis and associated datasets are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You are free to share and adapt this work with appropriate attribution.

Planetary Computer Citation

If using Microsoft Planetary Computer data, please cite: microsoft/PlanetaryComputer (2022)

Urban Green Cover & Heat Risk Assessment: Adelaide-region A Research Brief on Urban Forestry Data